|
KMID : 0895420060160030211
|
|
Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Enviromental Hygiene
2006 Volume.16 No. 3 p.211 ~ p.221
|
|
|
Desorption Efficiencies and Storage Stabilities of Ketones in Work Environment
|
|
Kim Kang-Yoon
Choi Sung-Pil
Ha Chul-Joo
Choi Ho-Chun
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
This study was performed to compare with desorption efficiency and storage stability of CSC and CMS tubes for
Ketones in workplace air. 1. The best desorbing solution for CSC tube was 1 % or 3 % dimethylformamide(DMF) in carbon disulfide(CS2). The desorption efficiencies were 96.40 % for cyclohexanone, 94.86 % for acetone, 96.96 % for methyl ethyl ketone(MEK), 103.44 % for methyl isobutyl ketone(MIBK), 100.17 % for methyl amyl ketone(MAK), 100.43 % for methyl butyl ketone(MBK), 97.01 % for toluene and 99.33 % for trichloroethylene(TCE). 2. The best desorbing solution for CMS tube was 1 % or 3 % DMF in CS2. The desorption efficiencies were 96.42 % for cyclohexanone, 98.53 % for acetone, 99.67 % for MEK, 105.48 % for MIBK, 100.13 % for MAK, 100.13 % for MBK, 95.42 % for toluene and 98.15 % for TCE. 3. In the storage condition at room temperature(20 ℃), the recovery rates of cyclohexanone and MEK on CSC tube were rapidly decreased 30.9 % and 50.9 % after 4 weeks, respectively. The recovery rates of all of 6 ketones and 2 nonpolar solvents were shown over 80 % after 1 week in the storage condition of refrigerate temperature(-4 ℃), and were kept over 80 % after 4 weeks in the storage condition of freezer temperature(-20 ℃). 4. The recovery rates of cyclohexanone on CMS tube were 80.6 % for 1 week after and 60.5 % for 4 weeks after at room temperature(20 ℃). The recovery rates of cyclohexanone were shown 80.6 % for 1 week after and 60.5 % for 4 weeks after at - 4 ℃, and of 6 ketones and 2 non-polar solvents were kept stable
over 85 % at -4 ℃ and over 97 % at -20 ℃ for 4 weeks after. In conclusion, the best desorbing solution was 1 % or 3 % DMF in CS2 and more appropriate sorbent tube for ketones and non-polar solvents was CMS than CSC. We recommend CSC tube would be useful if the samples analyzed within 1 week because CMS tubes are more expensive than CSC tubes. However, if the storage time is needed more than 3 weeks, CMS tubes should be suitable and the storage condition should be below -20 ℃.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
ketones, desorption efficiency, storage starbility, charcoal tube
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|